TRENDCALC ESSAY
The First Principle of First Principles
Why life gets worse for 80% of people — and why MPIA is what they were looking for all along
Market Professional Investor Approach
October 2, 2026
Philip S. Hammond, CFP™
The math, and the instrument
Life is going to get materially worse for 80% of people. That is not a mood. It is the likely path of a government and monetary system that has borrowed against the future faster than it can grow.
U.S. debt held by the public is already about the size of the entire economy. Official projections take it from roughly 100% of GDP now toward 120% within a decade, then much higher after that. The national debt is not a talking point. It is exploding higher. It cannot be paid back. It will never be paid back — at least not in the ordinary sense.
Annual deficits remain in the neighborhood of $2 trillion. Net interest is already about $1 trillion a year and is on a path to more than double. Interest is becoming a first-order claim on the future — not a footnote.
The growth required to grow out of it is not coming at the scale politicians keep promising. So the bill gets collected the only two ways an all-but-checkmated empire can collect it:
1. Higher taxes — you get poorer.
2. Inflation — you get poorer.
That is not ideology. It is arithmetic.
![]()
The bill is collected one of two ways.
When interest compounds faster than productive growth, a government does not “pay the debt back.” It transfers the loss. Taxes take purchasing power from the top of your paycheck. Inflation takes it from the bottom of your savings, your wages, and your future. Same robbery. Different doorway.
A common conclusion follows from that math, and as far as it goes it is useful: the state is the problem; drop the ideology; get the machine out of the way so investment and entrepreneurial spirit can run.
The state is the primary instrument. It prints. It borrows. It taxes. It inflates. It socializes losses and privatizes competence. That is not a conspiracy theory. That is what a leveraged political machine does when it cannot grow fast enough and will not shrink.
If you stop there, you still lose.
The state is the tool. The deeper cause is the choice.
The 80% who get poorer are not merely victims of a distant political machine. They are getting, in large part, what they already chose — and what they keep choosing — through the people and institutions they trust with their lives.
That is the First Principle of First Principles.
People do not mainly get the life they wish. They get the life implied by the decisions they make for themselves and their families, and by who they do and do not trust for information, guidance, and advice.
A lot of people, maybe even most, are lazy thinkers. Not stupid. Lazy. But it is that laziness of mind and decision-making that will make them stupid and foolish and frustrated. Laziness does the first job. Stupidity is what it produces. They stop examining. They stop owning what happens. They stop choosing on purpose. Then the world feels random and cruel, and the only story that still comforts them is that none of it was theirs.
That is how they slide into victimhood: everything that happens to them, and everything that fails to happen, is always someone else’s fault. The state. The other party. The boss. The market. The media. The spouse. The times. Anyone but the person in the mirror. So they go through life bitter and angry at the world for how crappy their life is, and never realize they did it all to themselves.
They enslaved themselves. They gave up their agency to someone who was happy to take it — a party, a pundit, a planner, a program, a feed, a social influencer — and then called the resulting cage oppression. The taker did not have to kick the door in. The door was handed over. Lazy thinking outsourced the hard questions. Outsourced questions produce outsourced lives. Outsourced lives produce resentment, because the results arrive wearing someone else’s name and none of the promised rescue.
Victimhood is not a feeling that happened to them. It is the interest payment on surrendered agency. Keep making that payment long enough and bitterness starts to look like a personality. It is not. It is the long-term compounded return of refusing to think for themselves, then refusing to own what that refusal bought.
The state is powerful because that habit is widespread. A state cannot harvest what people refuse to plant in its fields. It needs dependents, spectators, and believers. It needs people who treat politics as a substitute for ownership. It needs people who will accept an official inflation number as the truth of their cost of living. It needs people who will confuse a prepackaged portfolio with a plan for sovereignty. It needs people who will wait for a savior coalition — a political party or a radical movement — instead of becoming personally hard to kill, literally and metaphorically.
So yes: the state is a primary cause. It is not the deepest one. The deeper cause, for those 80%, is that they are receiving the output of their own selection process. They chose what to believe. They chose whom to believe. They chose not to own the consequences.
That sounds harsh. It is supposed to. Soft language and safe spaces are how people got put in that 80%, and how they stay there.
Both teams sell the same product in different wrappers
Whether someone is Democrat Blue or Republican Red, liberal or conservative, hard left or hard right, the operating belief is almost identical: if our guy gets in, and their guy gets out, life will finally become wonderful, easy, peaceful, and taken care of. One side calls the other evil. The other side returns the favor. Both treat the next election as a rescue operation. Both are wrong.
And changing teams does not get you out of the box. It redecorates the box. Different colors. Different slogans. Different villains. Same structure: look upward, outsource the hard parts, wait to be managed. Dependence with a new marketing plan is still dependence. Enslavement with better branding is still enslavement.
That is why “just get our people in” keeps failing the people who chant it. Leadership can change the temperature. It cannot think for you, save for you, train for you, choose your inner circle for you, or compound capital for you. A better president does not make a lazy thinker sovereign. A worse president does not make an owner helpless. The state remains a primary instrument of the squeeze. Team affiliation does not repeal that arithmetic.
The error is not that one party is imperfect. The error is the hope that any party is a parent. The moment you need a politician to make your life work, you are owned. You have already accepted membership in the 80% outcome. You have hired someone with no skin in the game called your life, and you tell yourself that for the greater good they will be altruistic and responsible for you and your household. Then you are shocked when their incentives — power, narrative, the next cycle — do not match yours.
You can prefer one set of policies to another. You can vote. You can argue. None of that is the roadmap. If your plan still requires the right team to win before you become free, you are not planning freedom. You are planning a different warden — or, in one group’s marketing vernacular, a different ruling king.
Who wears the pants in your life
The First Principle of First Principles still holds. People get what follows from the decisions they make and from whom they trust. If the person you trust most with your future is a candidate, a party, a cable slot, a feed, or a social influencer, you have told the truth about your plan — and about who wears the pants and does the thinking in your life. Your plan is to be a lazy, non-thinking fool who needs to be taken care of and told what to do, like an adolescent who never grew up. Taken-care-of adolescents are easy to cage, easy to tax, easy to inflate, easy to scare, and easy to keep compliant and in place.
Following social influencers is among the stupidest forms of that laziness. It is lazy thinking with a ring light. You hand your judgment to a stranger who has optimized a face, a hook, and a funnel — then you call it research. You outsource adulthood to someone whose business model requires you not to grow up. The product is not wisdom. The product is your attention, your imitation, and eventually your wallet.
Get rid of it. All of it. Social influence is not a lighter version of politics. It is the same machine in casual clothes. Political elites and social influencers run the same marketing plan: my superior decision-making will make your life better than your own thinking would. Both sell relief from the burden of agency. Both need you uncertain, comparison-sick, and hungry for a voice that sounds sure. Both will tell you they care. Both will put their own first-best interest first. Everything else is subordinate to that — your freedom, your family, your capital, your soul.
They do not have your best interest at heart. They will market the idea that they do, because that is what converts. A man or woman who needs an influencer to tell them how to live has already told the market who is in charge. It is not them. And those who are not in charge of their own mind will not stay in charge of their money, their household, or their future — no matter which party wins and no matter how many people follow the account they follow.
The 1% you chose
The political class, the feed, and the social influencer will sell you a different story. They will market the idea that the problem is the 1%ers — that those people did something to you, took something from you, that they are the cause of your plight, your station in life, everything bad that happened to you, and all evil in the world.
No. The problem is you — and the people you choose to have influence over you for information, guidance, and advice.
If you think those 1%ers, or anyone, have power and control over your life, you gave it to the specific 1%ers you chose. AOC. Elizabeth Warren. Soros. Trump. Elon. Bezos. Racism as an all-purpose explanation. BLM. The DSA. The Muslim Brotherhood. Etcetera. Etcetera. The list is too long, and it cuts every direction. Yes — all of those you give influence to are the actual 1%ers who are messing with your life and taking you over. They are the true 1%ers messing up your life. They are the ones that own you, which is why you have no ownership. You gave it to them. They are the slave masters you chose with your choices. They are the ones you enslaved yourself to.
They are also the ones who sold you the idea of your own little “safe space.” Safe space is just a nicer sales-and-marketing word for a cage. The cage still enslaves you. The padding is part of the pitch.
Just as there are forms of wealth other than money, 1%ers are not limited to people with the biggest brokerage statements. There are 1%ers of money, 1%ers of political power, 1%ers of media reach, 1%ers of moral fashion, 1%ers of the feed. Anyone in the thin layer that lives by steering other people’s attention and agency belongs on the list.
And inside that layer there are two types.
The first think for themselves. They learned to play the game of life, play it to win, and set an example of how you — or anyone — can get there. They climbed terrain. Their lives are the map.
The second sell maps. They sell supposed advice and guidance on how to climb mountains of success without ever having climbed the terrain they draw for others. The reason is simple: the map they sell is not really a map up the mountain. It is a product. Those marketing professionals got rich influencing you and others by getting you to buy garbage advice dressed as a path. They got rich on power, control, influence, and money by selling fake maps of success, prosperity, and the promised land.
You see, the problem was never all 1%ers. It was the 1%ers who got rich as social-influence marketing professionals — selling maps they never walked, collecting personal power and monetary wealth from people who did not want to think.
Even as true as that is, or as true as you want it to be, the bigger cause remains the same: you, and the choices you make for yourself, and who and what you choose to let influence you. You are the dummy getting exactly what you signed up for.
What people are actually looking for
Here is the part most commentary never reaches.
Under the anger, under the team colors, under the scrolling and the waiting to be rescued, people are looking for something they have rarely been able to say out loud or get down on paper.
They want to stop being afraid of the next bill, the next year, the next regime. They want their family a rung higher than the life they were handed. They want to think their own thoughts. They want to trust the right people and stop bleeding trust into the wrong ones. They want a spine that does not collapse when the official story changes. They want financial independence that is real, not a brochure number. They want economic freedom, security, self-sovereignty, and personal autonomy. They want to become personally hard to kill.
That is what they are after. They have been taught to ask for it in political language, so they keep asking the state and the feed to deliver a private good. The state cannot deliver it. The feed will not deliver it. Ownership can.
The path to avoid membership in the 80% club is not “better politics first.” Politics can improve the weather. It cannot give you a spine. The key is ownership of everything in your life, including the things other people did to you. Someone else can injure you. Someone else can tax you. Someone else can inflate the unit of account. None of that cancels the requirement that you must own the response. If you wait for justice before you build, you will wait through the decline.
You have to become hard to kill.
• Financially and economically
• Physically
• Mentally
• Emotionally
• Spiritually
Not as slogans. As operating conditions.
MPIA is the name for the walk
That is what MPIA is.
MPIA — the Market Professional Investor Approach — is not a product and not a hot take. It includes a great deal of investing and the building of personal transformative wealth. Underneath the tactics it is a philosophy for walking through a world that is going to tax and inflate the unprepared. You do not rent your future from institutions that do not love you. You do not rent your mind from people who need you suggestible.
Social influencers and the political class are antithetical to MPIA for the same reason. Both require you to remain the adolescent in the room. MPIA requires you to become the adult.
The same split runs through money. Most of what is sold as financial advice is conventional wisdom with a credential on it: passive buy-and-hold, get-rich-slow, get-rich-safely by saving, broad diversification as a substitute for judgment, averaging into averages, and CPI treated as the true inflation hurdle from which every plan, projection, and portfolio must flow. That package can raise a measure of security. It is not built to produce transformative wealth — the kind that moves a family up a rung and toward true financial independence, economic freedom, self-sovereignty, and personal autonomy.
The industry that sells that package is an industry of marketing professionals. They push a prepackaged map. They need you to believe advice is a commodity and the only adult variable is the fee. When the map fails the real cost of living, they reach for compliance and regulation as the reason they cannot do more. Rules are real. Using rules as a blanket over conventional wisdom is something else.
Market Professionals are a thinner club. Call it the wealth 5% if you are generous. It is more likely a 2% club. They play the actual game of markets and of life. They do not think for you. They refuse to keep you adolescent. MPIA was born from that distinction.
Who you trust for information, guidance, and advice is an allocation. Allocate it to someone who needs you helpless and you bought a warden. Allocate it to someone who requires you to own the result, and you bought a walk. The 80% either hire nobody or they hire the package and shop it on price. Both faces are unowned judgment. The 20% own the response — some alone, some with a Market Professional who will not let them stay a spectator.
MPIA builds four kinds of wealth at once:
![]()
Wallet. Mind. Whom. Spirit.
Wealth in the wallet. Exponential-alpha, transformative capital — the kind that actually moves a family up a rung, not the kind that keeps you one layoff from the same anxiety with a nicer car. Not “I maxed an account.” The kind of wealth that produces true financial independence, economic freedom, higher financial security, self-sovereignty, and personal autonomy. In a tax-and-inflate regime, cash-like claims on a melting unit of account are not safety. They are a slow surrender. You need assets and skills that can compound faster than the confiscation of the true inflation you face.
Wealth of the mind. The refusal to stay a lazy thinker. First-principles thinking instead of borrowed narratives. The ability to tell the difference between a map drawn by someone selling the map and the terrain under your feet. If you cannot think, you will be governed by people who can.
Wealth with the whom. Who you marry, partner with, raise, employ, learn from, and allow into your confidence. Most destinies are social before they are financial. Trust is an allocation decision. Allocate it badly and no portfolio saves you. Allocate it well and you get leverage no ticker can match.
Wealth of the spirit. The interior durability to carry responsibility without becoming bitter, brittle, or bought. Inflation taxes the wallet. Despair taxes the will. If the spirit collapses, the other three follow. That durability does not come from the feed, and it does not come from a party. It comes from standing under something higher than your own appetite and your own fear — a living faith that you are not the final authority in the universe, and therefore not the final orphan in it. People who build that way last. People who treat themselves as the highest power eventually sell the other three wealths cheap.
That is why MPIA is the answer and the roadmap, not another round of “the other team is the problem.”
It does not happen overnight. Ownership is a practice. Transformative wealth is a multi-year construction project. You do not become hard to kill by consuming content about being hard to kill. You do it by taking back the decisions you previously farmed out: what you spend, what you learn, what you own, whom you believe, what you will endure, what you will not outsource.
The 20% who will not get hurt the same way — who may even advance while the median household is squeezed — are largely the people who already did this, whether or not they had language for it. Some called it entrepreneurship. Some called it savings and ownership. Some called it not being a sucker. Some just had parents who taught them that nobody is coming. MPIA puts into words what a lot of them already had in their heads and could not get onto paper. That is not a claim of uniqueness. It is a claim of articulation. The pattern was already there. MPIA names the pattern and turns it into a walkable path.
Look at the split honestly.
The 80% will experience the next decade as a rising cost of staying still. Housing, energy, food, insurance, healthcare, education — the real basket — will keep running ahead of the official story. Wages will look “up” in nominal terms and feel down. Tax complexity will grow because complexity is how extraction hides. They will argue about left and right while both sides spend. They will treat the state as parent, then as villain, then as parent again. They will get poorer through taxes and inflation because they remain positioned as counterparties to the extraction: labor taxed first, cash eroded second, attention captured third.
The 20% will feel the same weather and live in a different climate. They will own productive claims instead of only wage claims. They will have optionality — skills, savings, networks, health, location, belief — so a bad policy year is an inconvenience, not a sentence. They will not need the coalition to get its story straight before they act. That is the whole difference.
A wall of investment and entrepreneurial spirit with the state out of the way is a worthy public hope. Build that wall in your own life first. A country of people who take ownership of their lives is harder to loot than a nation of dependents looking to their political masters for anything or everything. A family that is financially independent is not waiting on a manifesto. A mind that will not outsource judgment cannot be herded cheaply. A spirit that will not sell itself does not need permission.
The common enemy, named correctly
The common enemy is not only the state. The common enemy is the arrangement in which people refuse ownership of their individual lives and then call the consequences oppression. The state feeds on that arrangement. Ideology is the costume. Influence is the costume. Dependence is the meal.
The debt will be paid. You will pay it in taxes, or you will pay it in inflation, or you will refuse to sit still long enough to be the residual claimant of other people’s denial.
That last option is available. It has always been available. Most will not take it, because taking it requires thinking, and blaming others is easier than thinking for yourself.
That is not a tragedy that happened to them.
That is the First Principle of First Principles, collecting its due.
Call to action
Stop looking for someone to take care of you.
Think for yourself. Act for yourself. Own everything that happens in your life — including what the other side did and what your side failed to do. Stop blaming “the 1%” as a blob. Name the specific voices you handed the pants to, then take the pants back. Cut the political parent. Cut the influencer. Cut the fake map. Cut the story that your future is a spectator sport.
Become hard to kill in all five domains: financial and economic, physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual.
Build personal transformative wealth the MPIA way: in the wallet, of the mind, with the whom, and of the spirit. Create the kind of transformative wealth engines that let a family take a step up the ladder — true financial independence, economic freedom, higher security, self-sovereignty, and personal autonomy. That is what you have been looking for, even if you never had the words.
The 80% outcome is the default for people who wait — a life of scarcity. The 20% outcome is the result for people who own — a life of abundance.
You do not need a new team. You need your agency back. You need a walk, not a warden.
Start the walk.
— TrendCalc / MPIA
Author Note
This is part of an ongoing series on TrendCalc.net examining how conventional frameworks have constrained real wealth creation — and how a more market professional investing approach can change the outcomes.
At my +60 age, when many in the advice professional business are winding down or fully retiring, I find myself more energized and purposeful than ever. After more than 40+ years as a financial advisor, I’ve made a deliberate shift from the conventional model I was initially taught and had once practiced to one centered on true wealth creation, client agency, and economic sovereignty. I have little personal interest in traditional retirement. Instead, I’m driven to help as many individuals and families as possible reach the “promise land” of transformative wealth — the kind that funds real steps up the ladder of life, higher living standards, and genuine financial independence and economic freedom.
My goal is to equip people with the knowledge, mindset, and decision-making frameworks to achieve abundance and purpose rather than settle into scarcity, stress, and fear of running out. Whether that happens directly through a client relationship or indirectly — by readers gaining the understanding and confidence to become far better investors and stewards of their own capital — the mission remains the same: to help as many others foster greater personal self-sovereignty, autonomy, and the freedom to live life on their own terms. What I’ve learned cannot be allowed to die with me; it must be shared so others can build stronger, more secure futures for themselves and their families.
Important Disclaimer
This article is provided for general educational and informational purposes only. It is not intended to provide personalized financial, investment, tax, legal, or other professional advice. The concepts, frameworks, and examples discussed are general in nature and may not be suitable for every individual’s unique financial situation, risk tolerance, or goals. Achieving financial independence, economic freedom, or any level of personal self-sovereignty depends on many factors, including market conditions, personal circumstances, and disciplined execution. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Readers should consult with a qualified financial advisor, tax professional, or other appropriate licensed professional before making any financial decisions. The author and publisher do not guarantee any specific outcomes and are not responsible for any losses or damages that may result from the application of the ideas presented.
